Understand how AI handles local queries
AI models process local queries through a fundamentally different pipeline than global informational queries. When a user asks “what is content marketing,” the AI draws from training data and web search results without geographic filtering. When a user asks “best coffee shop in Rotterdam,” the AI must determine the user's location intent, retrieve location-specific sources, and synthesize recommendations from local review data, maps, and geo-tagged content.
The core difference: AI has no GPS. Unlike Google Maps, which uses your phone's location to show nearby results, AI assistants rely on explicit location signals in the query or conversation context. “Near me” queries in AI are handled differently depending on the platform — some ask the user for a location, some infer from IP address, and some default to general advice without specific recommendations.
This creates a specific optimization gap. Businesses that dominate Google Maps for local search may be invisible in AI responses because AI uses different signals than Google's local algorithm.
Local query types AI encounters:
| Query type | Example | How AI typically responds |
|---|---|---|
| Explicit location | “best dentist in Amsterdam” | Retrieves local sources, names specific businesses |
| Near me | “dentist near me” | Varies by platform — may ask for location or default to general advice |
| Implicit local | “emergency plumber open now” | Some platforms infer local intent, others treat as informational |
| Category + city | “Italian restaurants Haarlem” | Retrieves Google Maps data, review sites, local guides |
| Comparison + local | “best pizza Amsterdam vs Rotterdam” | Synthesizes from review aggregators and local food blogs |
Compare local behavior across AI platforms
Each AI platform handles local queries differently. This determines which optimization strategies matter for each.
| Feature | ChatGPT (with search) | Perplexity | Google Gemini | Microsoft Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location awareness | Asks user or infers from account settings | Infers from IP; can ask | Full Google Maps integration | Infers from Bing location data |
| Names specific businesses | Yes, with web search on | Yes, always cites sources | Yes, pulls from Maps + reviews | Yes, cites Bing + Yelp |
| Primary local data source | Yelp, TripAdvisor, Google Maps (via web search) | Google Maps, Yelp, Reddit, local blogs | Google Business Profile, Maps, Reviews | Bing Places, Yelp, TripAdvisor |
| Shows maps/ratings | No (text only) | No (text + source links) | Yes (embedded Maps cards) | Sometimes (Bing Maps integration) |
| Review data cited | Google Reviews, Yelp, TripAdvisor | Google Reviews, Reddit comments, niche review sites | Google Reviews directly | Yelp, TripAdvisor, Bing Reviews |
| “Near me” handling | Asks for city/zip or gives generic tips | Uses IP geolocation, names businesses | Uses device location, shows Maps results | Uses Bing location settings |
| Local content depth | 3–5 recommendations with descriptions | 5–10 options with source links | Deep integration with Maps data | 3–5 options from Bing index |
Key takeaway: Google Gemini has the strongest local data integration because it accesses Google Maps and Google Business Profile directly. ChatGPT and Perplexity rely on web search, which means they pull from review sites, blogs, and directories. This makes review platforms and local content more important for non-Google AI visibility.
For a full AEO overview: What Is AEO: Complete Guide.
Map local signals AI models use
Local signals for AI are the data points AI systems retrieve and weigh when generating location-specific responses. These overlap with but are not identical to traditional local SEO signals.
| Signal | Impact on AI responses | Where it lives |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | High — primary data source for Gemini, secondary for others | Google Maps |
| Review volume + recency | High — AI cites businesses with more recent reviews | Google, Yelp, TripAdvisor, industry-specific platforms |
| Review content (keywords) | High — AI extracts specific phrases from reviews | All review platforms |
| NAP consistency | Medium — inconsistent data confuses entity matching | Directories, website, social profiles |
| LocalBusiness schema | Medium — helps AI extract structured location data | Your website |
| Local content on website | Medium-High — geo-targeted pages give AI location-specific text to cite | Your blog, service area pages |
| Local backlinks and mentions | Medium — local publications, chambers of commerce, event sites | External websites |
| Reddit and forum mentions | Medium-High — Perplexity and ChatGPT heavily cite Reddit | Reddit, Quora, local forums |
| Wikipedia / Wikidata | High for parametric knowledge — but only for notable businesses | Wikimedia |
| Social media (local tags) | Low-Medium — AI rarely cites social posts directly, but they contribute to entity understanding | Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn |
What is different from local SEO: Google's local algorithm weighs proximity, Google Business Profile completeness, and link authority. AI models weigh source diversity, review content richness, and structured data extractability. A business that ranks #1 on Google Maps may not appear in ChatGPT's response because ChatGPT pulls from Yelp and TripAdvisor, not Google Maps directly.
Apply the three-layer model to local queries
Far & Wide's three-layer AI visibility model applies directly to local businesses, but each layer works differently for local versus global queries.
Layer 1: Parametric knowledge (what AI knows from training data)
Most local businesses have zero parametric knowledge. AI training data includes Wikipedia, major publications, and large web crawls — but a neighborhood bakery or local law firm rarely appears in these sources. This means Layer 1 is typically not a factor for local businesses, unless you are a well-known regional brand, a restaurant featured in national press, or a business with a Wikipedia page.
How to test: Open ChatGPT with web search OFF. Ask “What do you know about [Your Business Name]?” If it returns nothing or inaccurate information, parametric knowledge is not working for you.
Layer 2: Contextual web search (what AI finds when searching with context)
This is where most local businesses get cited. When a user asks “best dentist in Utrecht” with web search enabled, the AI searches the web, retrieves review sites, local directories, and blog posts, then synthesizes a response. Your visibility here depends on how prominent your business is across retrievable sources — reviews, local guides, and your own optimized content.
Layer 3: Fresh session retrieval (what AI finds in a clean session)
Test this by opening a new, clean session (no prior conversation context) and asking your target local queries. The results often differ from Layer 2 because the AI has no conversational context to refine its search. This layer shows your baseline local AI visibility.
Local three-layer audit template:
| Layer | Test method | What to measure | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layer 1 | ChatGPT, web search OFF: “What do you know about [Business]?” | Mentioned? Accurate? | Accurate mention (or acknowledge gap if too small) |
| Layer 2 | ChatGPT, web search ON, after discussing your category: “Best [category] in [city]?” | Named? What position? What source cited? | Top-3 recommendation |
| Layer 3 | Fresh session, first message: “Best [category] in [city]?” | Named? What source cited? | Mentioned in response |
For a full audit process: How to Run an AEO Audit.
Step 1: Claim and optimize your Google Business Profile
Google Business Profile (GBP) is the single highest-impact local AEO action. Gemini pulls from it directly. ChatGPT and Perplexity access it indirectly through web search results that include Maps data.
Optimization checklist for AI visibility:
- Business name: Use your exact legal name. Do not keyword-stuff (“Best Pizza Amsterdam | Mario's Pizzeria” will not help AI and may get your profile suspended).
- Category: Select the most specific primary category available. “Italian Restaurant” is better than “Restaurant.” AI uses this for entity classification.
- Description: Write 750 characters that include your location, specialty, and what makes you different. AI may extract this directly. Start with: “[Business Name] is a [category] in [city] that [specific differentiator].”
- Services / Menu: Fill out every available section. AI extracts structured service lists.
- Attributes: Check all relevant attributes (wheelchair accessible, free Wi-Fi, outdoor seating). These appear in AI responses as feature mentions.
- Photos: Upload 20+ photos with descriptive filenames (not IMG_4521.jpg, but “outdoor-terrace-amsterdam-restaurant.jpg”).
- Posts: Publish Google Posts weekly. These are indexable and give AI fresh content signals tied to your location.
- Q&A: Seed 10–15 questions and answers that match queries your customers ask AI. These are crawlable.
- Hours and contact: Keep accurate. Outdated hours create trust issues across all AI platforms.
Step 2: Fix NAP consistency
NAP (Name, Address, Phone number) consistency means your business information is identical across every online listing. AI systems cross-reference multiple sources to verify business entities. If your address appears as “Keizersgracht 123” on your website, “Keizersgracht 123A” on Yelp, and “123 Keizersgracht” on TripAdvisor, AI may treat these as uncertain or separate entities.
Where to check and fix NAP:
| Platform | Priority for AI | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | Critical | Verify exact match with website |
| Your website (footer + contact page) | Critical | Single source of truth |
| Yelp | High (ChatGPT source) | Claim listing, verify NAP |
| TripAdvisor | High (ChatGPT, Copilot source) | Claim listing, verify NAP |
| Apple Maps / Apple Business Connect | Medium | Claim and verify (Siri uses this) |
| Bing Places | Medium (Copilot source) | Claim and verify |
| Facebook / Instagram | Medium | Match address and phone exactly |
| Industry directories | Medium | Depends on industry |
| Chamber of Commerce / KvK (NL) | Medium | Verify registered address matches |
Tools for NAP audit: Moz Local ($99/year), BrightLocal ($39/month), or manually check the top 10 directories for your market. For most local businesses, manually checking 15–20 listings takes 2–3 hours and is sufficient.
European-specific note: In the Netherlands, KvK (Kamer van Koophandel) registration data is publicly searchable and often crawled. Make sure your KvK-registered address matches your website and GBP. The same principle applies to Companies House (UK), Handelsregister (Germany), and equivalent registries in other EU countries.
Step 3: Implement LocalBusiness schema
LocalBusiness schema markup gives AI structured, machine-readable data about your business location, hours, services, and geographic area. Implement it on your homepage and each location page.
Use the most specific @type available. Schema.org provides subtypes of LocalBusiness: Restaurant, Dentist, LegalService, RealEstateAgent, AutoRepair, and dozens more. Using Restaurant instead of generic LocalBusiness gives AI a more precise entity classification.
Key fields for AI extraction:
areaServed: Tells AI which geographic area you cover. Critical for service-area businesses (plumbers, lawyers) that serve a wider region.geo: Latitude/longitude coordinates. Helps AI match your business to location queries.aggregateRating: AI often cites rating data in recommendations. Include it if you have reviews.hasMenu/makesOffer: Links to structured service/product data. AI can follow these for deeper extraction.
For more on schema implementation: Schema Markup for AEO: How to Help AI Understand Your Brand.
Step 4: Build local review density
Review density for AI means having enough recent, detailed reviews across the specific platforms that AI systems cite. This is not about star ratings alone — AI extracts the text content of reviews to generate recommendations.
Which review platforms each AI cites
| AI platform | Primary review sources | Secondary sources |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Yelp, TripAdvisor, Google Reviews (via web search) | Reddit, niche blogs |
| Perplexity | Google Reviews, Reddit, niche review sites | Yelp, local blogs |
| Gemini | Google Reviews (directly), Google Maps | TripAdvisor, Yelp |
| Copilot | Yelp, TripAdvisor (via Bing) | Google Reviews |
Review strategy priorities
- Google Reviews — baseline requirement for all platforms. Target: 50+ reviews with a 4.0+ average for competitive categories.
- Yelp — disproportionately important for ChatGPT. Many local ChatGPT responses cite Yelp directly. If your Yelp profile is empty, you are invisible to ChatGPT for local queries.
- Industry-specific platforms — TripAdvisor (restaurants, hotels), Healthgrades or ZorgkaartNederland (clinics in NL), Avvo or Advocatenorde (legal), G2/Capterra (B2B software, agencies).
- Reddit — Perplexity and ChatGPT cite Reddit threads heavily. Monitor r/[yourcity] subreddits. When someone asks “best [your category] in [your city],” that thread becomes a potential AI source.
How AI uses review text (not just ratings)
AI does not just count stars. It reads review content and extracts specific claims. A review saying “Best gluten-free pasta in Amsterdam, the truffle risotto is incredible, and they accommodate large groups easily” gives AI three extractable data points (gluten-free options, specific dish recommendation, group-friendly). A review saying “Great food, nice place, 5 stars!” gives AI nothing to work with.
Encourage detailed reviews by:
- Asking specific questions in follow-up emails: “What dish did you enjoy most?” or “What would you tell a friend about their first visit?”
- Responding to reviews with additional context (this text is also extractable)
- Timing requests within 24 hours of the experience, when details are fresh
Step 5: Create geo-targeted content
Geo-targeted content is website content that explicitly connects your expertise to a specific location. AI needs text-based location signals on your own website to associate your business with local queries.
Content types ranked by local AEO impact
| Content type | AI impact | Example | Why it works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service + city pages | High | “Emergency Plumber in Amsterdam-West” | Direct match for category + location queries |
| Local case studies | High | “How We Helped a Rotterdam Bakery Increase Foot Traffic 40%” | Named location + specific results = citable |
| Neighborhood guides | Medium-High | “Best Areas to Eat in Amsterdam Jordaan” | AI retrieves these for “where to eat in [neighborhood]” queries |
| Local resource pages | Medium | “Amsterdam Business Permits: What You Need to Know” | Positions you as local authority |
| Community involvement | Medium | “Our Partnership with Amsterdam Food Bank” | Local entity association |
| Local comparison content | Medium-High | “Amsterdam vs Utrecht for Tech Startups: Office Costs, Talent, and Infrastructure” | Captures comparison queries with local intent |
How to write service + city pages that AI can extract
Start each page with a definition-first paragraph: “[Service] in [City] involves [what you do]. [Your Business] provides [specific offering] to [specific audience] in [specific area].”
Do not create thin, duplicate pages that only swap city names. AI detects templated content and deprioritizes it. Each city page needs at least 3 unique elements:
- A specific local case study or client reference
- Local pricing or market context (e.g., “Average plumbing call-out in Amsterdam: €85–150, compared to €65–120 in smaller municipalities”)
- Neighborhood-specific information
European multi-city example: A dental clinic with locations in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Utrecht should have three separate location pages, each with:
- Location-specific team members
- Different patient testimonials from that location
- Local parking/transport information
- Area-specific service availability (e.g., “Saturday appointments available at our Rotterdam location”)
Step 6: Build local entity mentions
Local entity mentions are references to your business on external websites that AI systems crawl and cite. For local businesses, the most valuable mentions come from local sources, not national publications.
High-value local mention sources:
- Local news outlets — being quoted as an expert in a local newspaper or online news site
- Local business directories — chamber of commerce listings, city business guides
- Local event sponsorships — event websites that list sponsors with links
- Local blogger partnerships — food bloggers, lifestyle bloggers, neighborhood guides
- University and institution pages — if you work with local educational institutions
- Reddit /r/[yourcity] — organic mentions in relevant threads (do not spam; Reddit communities will downvote and report obvious self-promotion)
- Local podcasts — show notes pages are crawlable and often well-indexed
Prioritize sources AI already cites. Run your target local queries through ChatGPT and Perplexity. Look at which sources they cite in their responses. Those are the publications, directories, and review sites you need to be present on.
Step 7: Optimize for multi-language local queries
Multi-language local AEO is critical in European markets where users search in both English and their local language. In the Netherlands, a user might ask ChatGPT “beste tandarts Amsterdam” (Dutch) or “best dentist Amsterdam” (English). AI responds in the language of the query, but it retrieves sources in multiple languages.
How AI handles language in local queries
| Scenario | AI behavior |
|---|---|
| Query in English, business has English website | Direct match — high chance of citation |
| Query in local language, business has only English website | AI may still retrieve but less likely to cite — no direct text match |
| Query in local language, business has local language content | Best match — AI can extract native-language text for the response |
| Query in English, business has only local language website | AI may translate internally but citation likelihood drops |
Multi-language strategy
- Primary pages in both languages. Your homepage, service pages, and location pages should exist in both English and your local language. Use hreflang tags to connect them.
- Reviews in both languages. Encourage customers to leave reviews in their natural language. A mix of English and Dutch reviews helps cover both query languages.
- Blog content: local language for local topics. A neighborhood guide for Jordaan in Amsterdam performs better in Dutch for Dutch-language queries. International-facing content (for expats, tourists) should be in English.
- Schema in primary business language. Your LocalBusiness schema
descriptionshould be in the language most of your customers use. Add a second description inalternateNameor use a language-specific schema setup.
NL-specific example: An Amsterdam law firm serving both Dutch locals and international expats needs:
- Dutch service pages: “Arbeidsrecht advocaat Amsterdam” (employment law)
- English service pages: “Employment lawyer Amsterdam”
- Dutch Google Business Profile description + English website content
- Reviews in both Dutch and English
- Blog posts in Dutch for Dutch legal topics, English for expat-focused content
Manage multi-location businesses
Multi-location AEO requires treating each location as a separate entity in AI's understanding. AI models do not automatically connect your Rotterdam location to your Amsterdam headquarters unless you explicitly structure this relationship.
Separate entity strategy per location
| Element | Single location | Multi-location (per location) |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | 1 profile | 1 profile per location |
| LocalBusiness schema | On homepage | On each location page, linked via parentOrganization |
| Service pages | “[Service] in [City]” | “[Service] in [City A]” + “[Service] in [City B]” — unique content each |
| Reviews | All on one profile | Separate review profiles per location |
| Local content | City-specific blog posts | Neighborhood-specific content per location |
| NAP | One consistent set | One consistent set PER location |
The parentOrganization link in schema tells AI that a location is part of a larger brand, which helps with parametric knowledge (Layer 1) if the parent brand is known, while keeping the location entity distinct for local queries.
Apply local AEO by industry
Different industries have different local query patterns and platform dependencies. Here are specific strategies for four common local business types.
Restaurants and food businesses
Primary AI query patterns: “best [cuisine] in [city],” “restaurants near [landmark],” “where to eat in [neighborhood],” “[dietary need] restaurants [city]”
| Action | Priority | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile: full menu, photos, attributes | Critical | AI extracts menu items, dietary labels, price range |
| Yelp profile with 30+ reviews | Critical | ChatGPT's primary restaurant data source |
| TripAdvisor for tourist areas | High | Copilot and ChatGPT cite TripAdvisor for tourist queries |
| TheFork / OpenTable listing | Medium | These appear in AI web search results |
| Food blogger reviews | High | Perplexity cites local food blogs frequently |
| Instagram presence with location tags | Medium | Indirect — builds entity recognition, not directly cited |
Schema: Restaurant with servesCuisine, hasMenu | High | Structured data AI can extract directly |
Medical clinics and healthcare
Primary AI query patterns: “best [specialty] doctor in [city],” “[condition] treatment [city],” “dentist near me accepting new patients”
| Action | Priority | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile with insurance, services, hours | Critical | Gemini pulls directly |
| Healthgrades / ZorgkaartNederland (NL) / Doctoralia (EU) | Critical | Industry-specific review platforms AI cites |
| Patient reviews mentioning specific conditions | High | AI extracts “great for [condition]” phrases |
| Published articles or research | High | Builds parametric knowledge (Layer 1) |
Schema: Physician, Dentist, or MedicalClinic | High | Include medicalSpecialty field |
| YMYL content with hedged language | High | AI applies stricter standards to health content |
YMYL note: Health-related content must use hedged language (“may help,” “research suggests,” “consult your healthcare provider”). AI applies extra scrutiny to medical claims and is less likely to cite content that makes absolute health claims.
Law firms
Primary AI query patterns: “best [practice area] lawyer in [city],” “[legal issue] attorney near me,” “how much does [legal service] cost in [city]”
| Action | Priority | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile with practice areas | Critical | — |
| Avvo / Martindale / Advocatenorde (NL) profiles | Critical | Legal-specific review platforms |
| Case results and outcomes on website | High | AI cites specific results: “recovered €250K for client” |
| Practice area + city pages | High | “Employment Lawyer Amsterdam” — direct query match |
| Published legal commentary on local regulations | Medium-High | Builds authority, frequently cited by AI |
Schema: LegalService or Attorney with knowsAbout | High | Include practice areas in structured data |
Agencies and B2B services
Primary AI query patterns: “best [service] agency in [city],” “[service] agency near me,” “[service] company [city]”
| Action | Priority | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile with services listed | High | — |
| G2, Capterra, Clutch profiles | Critical | AI cites these for B2B recommendations |
| Case studies with client names and results | Critical | “Helped [Client] achieve [metric]” — directly citable |
| Service + city pages with pricing transparency | High | AI often includes pricing context |
| Industry awards and certifications | Medium | Named award = entity association |
Schema: ProfessionalService with areaServed | High | Define your service area explicitly |
Monitor local AI visibility
Location-specific prompt testing is the only reliable way to measure your local AI visibility. Automated tools exist but none cover location-specific queries comprehensively yet.
Manual monitoring protocol
- Create a query bank. List 15–20 local queries your customers would ask AI. Include explicit location queries (“best [category] in [city]”), near-me queries, and comparison queries.
- Test across four platforms. Run each query on ChatGPT (web search on), Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot. Record: Were you mentioned? (Yes/No). What position? (1st, 2nd, 3rd mentioned, or not at all). What source was cited? (Your website, a review site, a directory, a blog). What information was extracted? (Rating, specialty, pricing, location detail).
- Test from different contexts. AI responses change based on conversation context. Test from: a fresh session (no prior context), after establishing location context (“I'm in Amsterdam. What's a good dentist?”), and with specific needs (“I need a dentist who speaks English in Amsterdam”).
- Track monthly. AI responses shift as models update their web search results and (less frequently) their training data. Monthly tracking catches directional trends.
Monitoring spreadsheet structure
| Query | Platform | Date | Mentioned? | Position | Source cited | Info extracted | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “best Italian restaurant Amsterdam” | ChatGPT | 2026-04-13 | Yes | 2nd | Yelp | “4.5 stars, truffle pasta specialty” | Competitor named first |
| “best Italian restaurant Amsterdam” | Perplexity | 2026-04-13 | No | — | — | — | Food blog competitor cited |
Automated tools (emerging): Otterly.ai, Peec AI, and Profound track AI mentions but have limited location-specific query support as of early 2026. For most local businesses, manual testing with a structured spreadsheet is more reliable for now.
For a full audit methodology: How to Run an AEO Audit. For cost considerations: How Much Does AEO Cost.
Avoid these local AEO mistakes
Mistake 1: Optimizing only for Google Maps and ignoring other platforms. Google Maps dominance does not transfer to AI. ChatGPT pulls from Yelp and TripAdvisor. Perplexity pulls from Reddit and local blogs. If your entire local strategy is Google Business Profile, you are invisible to 60%+ of AI assistants.
Mistake 2: Creating thin city pages with swapped location names. “[Service] in Amsterdam” and “[Service] in Rotterdam” with identical content except the city name is detectable by AI. These pages get deprioritized. Each location page needs unique content: local case studies, area-specific pricing, neighborhood information.
Mistake 3: Ignoring Yelp because “nobody in Europe uses Yelp.” Yelp is one of ChatGPT's primary data sources for local business queries globally. Even in European markets where Yelp has low consumer adoption, ChatGPT still retrieves and cites Yelp data. Claim your Yelp profile and ensure basic information is accurate.
Mistake 4: Treating reviews as an SEO task instead of an AI content source. Star ratings matter for Google Maps ranking. Review text matters for AI citations. A business with 200 five-star reviews that all say “Great service!” gives AI nothing to extract. Ten detailed reviews describing specific experiences, dishes, outcomes, or specialties give AI rich content to cite.
Mistake 5: Not testing AI responses in local languages. In multilingual markets, AI responses differ dramatically between English and local-language queries. “Best restaurant Amsterdam” and “beste restaurant Amsterdam” can return completely different recommendations. Test in every language your customers use.
Contrarian take: stop chasing “near me” and own your category + city
Most local businesses obsess over “near me” queries. Here is the problem: AI handles “near me” poorly and inconsistently. Some platforms ask for location, some guess from IP, and some default to generic advice. The conversion potential of “near me” in AI is low because the user often does not get a direct recommendation.
Instead, focus on category + city queries: “best dentist Amsterdam,” “emergency plumber Rotterdam,” “Italian restaurant Haarlem.” These queries have explicit location intent that every AI platform can resolve. They return specific business recommendations. And they are more defensible — you can build content, reviews, and entity signals around a specific city, but you cannot optimize for a moving GPS target.
The businesses that dominate local AI responses own their category + city combination across multiple platforms: strong Google reviews, an active Yelp profile, Reddit mentions, local blog features, and a website with geo-specific content. “Near me” visibility follows automatically when you own the category + city.
Local AEO checklist
Use this to audit and optimize your local AI visibility. Check off each item as completed.
Foundation (Week 1–2)
- Google Business Profile claimed, verified, and fully completed (description, categories, services, attributes, photos, hours)
- NAP consistency checked across top 15 directories and fixed where inconsistent
- Yelp profile claimed with accurate business information
- TripAdvisor profile claimed (if applicable: restaurants, hotels, tourism)
- Industry-specific review platform profiles claimed (G2, Healthgrades, Avvo, etc.)
- Apple Business Connect profile claimed
- Bing Places profile claimed
Technical (Week 2–3)
- LocalBusiness schema (or specific subtype) implemented on homepage and location pages
- Schema includes
geo,areaServed,openingHoursSpecification, andaggregateRating - Multi-location: separate schema per location with
parentOrganizationlinking - robots.txt allows AI crawlers (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Anthropic)
- Pages load in under 3 seconds (AI crawlers have timeout limits)
Content (Week 3–6)
- Service + city pages created with unique content per location (not templated)
- 3+ local case studies published with named clients, locations, and specific results
- 2+ neighborhood or local guides published targeting geo-specific queries
- Content exists in both English and local language (for multilingual markets)
- Every location page starts with a definition-first paragraph including city name and service category
Reviews (Ongoing)
- Google Reviews: 50+ reviews, 4.0+ average, with recent reviews (last 30 days)
- Yelp: 10+ reviews with detailed descriptions
- Industry platform: 10+ reviews
- Review request process established (specific questions, 24-hour timing)
- Owner responses added to reviews (adds extractable context)
External signals (Ongoing)
- 5+ mentions on local websites (blogs, news, directories, event pages)
- Reddit presence in relevant city subreddit (organic, not spammy)
- 2+ local backlinks from community organizations, chambers of commerce, or local press
- Local partnerships that generate web mentions
Monitoring (Monthly)
- 15–20 target local queries tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot
- Results recorded in tracking spreadsheet with date, platform, position, and source cited
- Queries tested in both English and local language
- Competitor AI visibility tracked for same queries
- Action items identified from gaps in coverage